Communist Manifesto for the Destruction - myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theCommunist Manifesto for the Destructionof the Bourgeoisie. Answer: Introduction The bourgeoisie as observed by Karl Marx have always flourished with the Proletarians sinking in the heights of poverty over the history. the modern bourgeoisie is itself a long course of development, a series of revolutions in the modes of production and exchange (Marx Engels, 1847). The aspects that favor the bourgeoisie's progress are also the most likely factors that will result in their downfall. The owners of the means of production (bourgeoisie) have for long taken advantage of the workers and the slaves (proletariats)(Sokel, 2000). The continued exploitation can be explained by the fact that the proletariats are always competing for the meager salaries given by the employers amongst themselves creating conflicts and disunity amongst themselves. Also, the advancements in the modern technology were first experienced by the bourgeoisie, and they used them to their own advantage. Precisely, the tools that have been continuously used to amass wealth among the high-class will defi nitely be used as the tools of their destruction. Marx opined that the capitalist bourgeoisie without any shred of tenderness exploited the proletariat. The work executed by the proletariat contributed to the creation of a lot wealth for the capitalists but they were (workers) very little in return(Marx Engels, 1847). Marx went further to note that the products created from the industries and factories were more valuable than the labor used to bring them into existence. Marx was using this statement to criticize the meagre salary that was being paid to the works compared to the market price of the products they created. The Marx observation can be attributed to the continued ownership and control of the productions means by the capitalists. This means that the wealthy continued getting rich every day at the expense of the poor workers who did not benefit from the fruits of their labor. The Bourgeoisies after discovering that the work performed by the proletariats can yield lots of profits; they mercilessly utilized the proletariat(Lamb, 2015). The products created in the factories by the workers were sold for more than twice the cost of the labor. To increase their production, the factories hired more labor at low wages. The under-class ungrudgingly agreed to work for the low wages to cater for their most basic needs. For example, a worker paid $2 could produce goods or services worth $10. The owner of the means of production by this will accumulate millions of dollars as profit. The laborer minimally benefits from the fruits of his/her own labor. The capitalist owing to his financial command has ruined the once existing good family relationships resulting to conflicts over wealth and money. The bourgeoisie has torn away from the family its sentimental veil, and has reduced the family relations into mere monetary relationships(Marx Engels, 1847).' The divisions are a well-calculated formula to obtain and retain more work forces at the production schemes. The competition among brothers to secure a job creates an advantage to the factories. The higher the competition among the workers, the lower the prices for labor to be paid per unit time. The conflict among the low-class individuals is a perfect tool for the capitalists to earn more profits. The advancements in technology also explain the continued rule of the industries by the bourgeoisie. The owners of industries and factories have greatly been favored by the modern trends of communication. The series of industrial revolution in the continent is also a well working plan for the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie, by the rapid improvement of all instruments of production, by the immensely facilitated means of communication, draws all, even the most barbarian nations into civilization (Marx Engels, 1847). The modern tools of production are used to either replace human labor or even reduce the rates of working per unit time. The underclass are commonly threatened to work for more reduced wages, or else they lose their jobs. Due to desperation, they continue to suffer at the hands of their masters. The invention in communications has opened up new markets for the bourgeoisie. Online marketing has led to an increase in the gross sales in every financial year. The oppressed do n ot get any pay increase from their oppressors even with the improved sales. The bourgeoisie have had an experience of being a radical class, the proletariat are dreaming of taking over the world(Panitch, 2015). However, the means of production perpetuated by the bourgeoisie are the fruits containing their own seeds of destruction. The weapons with which the bourgeoisie felled feudalism to the ground are now turned against the bourgeoisie itself (Marx Engels, 1847). The capitalists are highly dependent on the communists. If the bourgeoisie does not pay back the efforts of the do not pay back the efforts of the proletariat appropriately, then they are on their eve of demise. The oppressed will soon seize power if their interests continue to be undermined. Marx argues, what the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, is its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable (Marx Engels, 1847). The same mechanisms that the high-class used to climb up the ladder will be used by the low class to bring them down and occupy their place at the top. Ultimately, the proletariat will launch a revolution against the bourgeoisie. The oppressed will soon discover the need of unity towards an achievement. The continued oppression of the proletariat will create a great resentment which will bring back their lost conscious. The regaining of the conscious will mark the start of a renaissance period. They will then join their hands together to fight their common enemy. The reunion of the workers will be a source of great ideologies. The presumption that the capitalists have inherent supremacy will be dismissed. According to Marx Engels (1847), in the contemporary society, the bourgeoisie is like a sorcerer. Just the way the powers of a sorcerer fade away with time so does the superiority of the capitalists. Soon, the bourgeoisie will be unable to control the economy of the world they once cast their spells. With the modern developments in the industrial sector, the number of the proletariat has not only multiplied but also grown more civilized. The conflicts among laborers have been dissolved owing to similar wages, similar lifestyles and similar financial constraints. The workers have resolved to form trade unions and other organization which will aid in a collective bargaining of their rights. The workers being the majority will definitely win the race. The fact that the bourgeoisie first experienced the industrial revolution explains why the proletariat has for long lagged behind. Currently, the oppressed can access the modern gadgets and utilize them to their advantage. While the bourgeoisie use the modern communication methods for marketing their products, the proletariat use them for mobilization and educating one another. Online platforms such as Facebook and Twitter help the oppressed to communicate widely, cheaply and timely. Bue to this, the struggle has adopted a continental dimension. Conclusion In conclusion, it is the best time for the world to adopt a different view of the social classes and stratification. The bourgeoisie should realize that their demise is growing nearer and assume better means of production. Some of the proletariats ought to be educated on false class consciousness. The should be made aware of their exploitation and coerced to take the necessary measures against it. The creation of more worker-friendly environments and rise of wages is the only way to a better world. This will bring to an end the prolonged class conflicts between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The oppressed will probably do away with any plans to overthrow the owners of the means of production. Through fairness, justice, and equity in the labor industry, the continents could emerge economical superpowers in a few years. The supposition that the capitalists must be the ruling class must be dismissed. The understanding that people have equal opportunities even amidst social inequal ity. References Lamb, P. (2015). Marx and Engels' Communistb Manifesto. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. Marx, K., Engels, F. (1847). Manifesto of the Communist Party. Moscow: Progress Publishers. Panitch, L. (2015). The Two Revolutionary Classes of the Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sokel, W. H. (2000). From Marx to Myth: The Structure and the Function of Self-Alienation in Kafka's Metamorphosis. The Literaly Review, 26(4), 486-495.